Friday, 11 January 2008

Accepting responsibility

I'm just getting at the end of my tether with the Royal Mail and the Weasel words they use to get out of their responsibilities.

I've used Special Delivery twice now. On both occasions the postmaster refused to accept that what I was sending had value. Apparently if the envelope I have sent doesn't arrive and I have to pay on my credit card, all I get from Royal Mail is my postage back.

Acquaintances who have sold via ebay, have used the belt and braces approach of using Recorded Delivery to prove to paypal that the item was received in the case of a dispute. While I think this is overstating the risk when sending a £9.99 widget, what came next appalled me. Some people have sent items that would normally be covered and had them go missing. When they claimed on the compensation the Royal Mail refused to accept the fact they had not got a record of delivery as proof of non-delivery, as their postmen sometimes don't . Am I being unreasonable in insisting the Royal Mail accept responsibility for the mistakes of their employees? That if there is no record of delivery, the sender is entitled to compensation.

Don't misunderstand me, I acknowledge that they're still about the best for most purposes. I find post-watch can be quite patronising in the level of understanding that they feel it is reasonable to expect from users: I don't have any sympathy for someone who shoves £100 in cash in an envelope with a second class stamp, and has a screaming fit when it doesn't arrive. Yes there should be limits to the liability of the standard catch all service, but when we stump up for the premium service we should not have to accept so many restrictions on what they will accept responsibility for.

I feel that when you pay over 12 times the cost of a first class stamp, we should expect the Royal Mail to accept some responsibility. That the £500 compensation should have fewer get out clauses. Passports and vouchers do have value, because if they go missing there is a cost involved in replacing them.

When I complained to the Royal Mail customer service team they did mention that they offer consequential loss insurance. But when I pointed out this was not offered at the counter (on two occasions) there was no response, just a continued repetition of the Royal Mail line as if the fact I did not accept that it was anything other than bad service was a sign of me not understanding what I was being told.

Please note, I reserve the right to delete anonymous comment.

3 Comments:

At Saturday, January 12, 2008 8:31:00 pm, Blogger Caz said...

Royal Mail are fine here ... its DHL you have to watch out for. I've had a parcel never arrive and they couldn't take a work parcel 20miles down the motorway to Southampton (but could make it to Holland & Sweden?!?!?).

Mind you in the past Royal Mail did loose a set of mud samples being sent Special Delivery to CEFAS for a disposal licence (for dredging material). It took a lot of conversations and explaining as to why 6pots of mud = £500 ... they looked on it as mud. We stuck at it and explained that the mud had come from the seabed of Portsmouth Harbour and involved hiring a team of commercial divers to gain it ... so the replacement set would need those divers again ... hence it was £500 mud!

... they now use TNT in Coolboxes (LOL when I have to stick post its to the fridge to tell people not to take the mud out the work fridge (its in the bottom) as it needs to be kept as close to the in situ temperature ... so that's the fridge! But my dredging days have now passed ....

 
At Monday, January 14, 2008 12:19:00 pm, Blogger Simon said...

DHL are competing here with Royal Mail for the role of least worst option.

ANC are utterly utterly terrible, having declared a box of wine marked fragile and in a sturdy box 1cm thick wasn't packed very well. Providing the box hadn't be thrown or dropped it would be OK, but of course expecting such care is wholely unreasonable.

 
At Monday, January 14, 2008 12:20:00 pm, Blogger Simon said...

Oh and while waiting at the depot an exiting member of ANC staff smiled sympathetically said "It could be worse- you could be working here."

 

Post a Comment

<< Home